Iro Tea · Method № 00 · The Standard

We don't sell the story. We publish the results.

Every tin we put our name on got there the same way — tasted blind, scored against the same rubric, sourced with care, and put on the record. This is the standard behind the number on the tin.

Heritage A century, a farm in Uji, the weight of ceremony.
Hype The right look, the right creator, sold out by noon.
Proof Blind-tasted. Scored. Published. Yours to check.
§ I · The premise

Most tea is sold to you on faith.

There are two usual stories — heritage and hype. Both can be true: the farms are real, and some drops sell out because the tea is genuinely good. But both ask the same thing of you: trust us, and don't check.

We're not against tradition — a great matcha is great largely because of things that are tradition. The cultivar, the shade-growing, the stone mill, the maker's hand. We keep all of that. But traditional is also just a word you can print on a bag, and a sold-out drop tells you about demand, not the leaf. Blind tasting is how you tell the two apart.

So we earn it a third way — not where we came from or who follows us, but what's in the cup, on the record, yours to check.

§ II · The method

Four things happen before a tea earns the tin.

  1. № 01

    Tasted blind.

    Every candidate is blind-coded and scored — no farm name, no price, no story in the room. A tea earns its place on the sheet, or it doesn't. It is never simply sold to us.

  2. № 02

    Water, held constant.

    We build our own water from scratch, remineralized to a target profile, with prep kept identical cup to cup — so what you're judging is the leaf, not our kettle. Every variable we can hold, we hold.

  3. № 03

    Source vetted, bar fixed.

    We pick suppliers on what shows up in the cup, then hold every batch to the same bar. The relationship can grow; the standard doesn't bend.

  4. № 04

    Results published.

    The scores, the split decisions, even where our own two-rater method falls short of a full sensory panel — all of it goes on the record. And the order never changes: the report comes first, then the tin. If a tea hasn't cleared the sheet, it doesn't get one.

Aroma Attack Mouthfeel Mid-Palate Umami Finish
fig. 1 · the rubric — six axes, five points each, two raters overlaid. (shape illustrative)
§ III · On consistency

Same standard, every batch.

We don't promise every tin tastes identical — tea is agricultural, and a fine leaf moves a little from lot to lot.

What we promise is that the test doesn't move. Every batch clears the same bar; when a lot carries its own character, it's noted on the tin. “Every tin passed the same test — here's how this one tastes” is a promise we can keep. “Every tin is identical” isn't, so we won't make it.

§ IV · The proof

Which brings us to M099.

M099 didn't earn the tin for where it came from. It earned it on the sheet.

7.60 / 10 First of eleven
blind-coded specimens · tied at the top

In the tasting notes: creamy and floral on the nose, a coated, silky mouthfeel, a sweet-umami balance with almost no bitterness, and a clean finish. The full survey — eleven specimens across four sessions, six axes, two calibrated raters, split scores and caveats included — is Report No. 01. Taste what we tasted, then decide.

Honest leaves. An honest process. A price that stays honest — because you're paying for tea, not a story.